Evidence of the existence of Jesus that science does not accept

Evidence of the existence of Jesus that science does not accept For centuries he would see that the existence of Jesus was real, but despite that have emerged writings, objects and buildings that seem to corroborate it, science continues to question each of the tests.   -The Bible is one of the biggest tests of their existence, 

but beyond the official Gospels, there are also some apocryphal, that is not accepted by the Church, in which there are many points that differ. 

  Laminae of lead: 70 books discovered in a cave in Jordan are considered the oldest documents of Christianity, but studies showed that the blades would be 2500 years ago it would be impossible for a Christian origin.   

Santa Cruz-remnants of: enough just to read a sentence from the French theologian Calvin, the sixteenth century, to overthrow this evidence.

 He said: "If all the pieces that claim to be from the Santa Cruz collect an immense it would. However, in the Gospel he says that one man was able to take it. "   -Rollos Dead Sea: were found in the 40s, in Israel, and the carbon-14 tests dated back between the years 150 a. C. and 70 d. C. Although pose one of the greatest proofs of the existence of Jesus, only mention a teacher of justice, 

which could refer to anyone.   -Corona Of thorns: in the cathedral Notre Dame de Paris is a crown, but is at least 16 centuries, impossibly which used to be Jesus Christ. It has no thorns and also a noble and degradable material could ever endure since that time.  

 -The Nails of Christ: in a documentary filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici, the story of the famous nails that appeared in a tomb two thousand years ago in Jerusalem,

 but could never be sure that had something to do with the crucifixion of counts Jesus. In 1911, the researcher Herbert Thurston discovered that there were 30 considered sacred nails around the world, when only three or four were used in the biblical event.